While penis envy and hysteria of the walking womb are laughable Freudian claims now, they were cutting edge during his time. Ironically, one of the more revolutionary aspects of his research was on just this; the idea of women’s sexuality. It’s important to note that while his theory here was radical for the time, he also considered women inferior, so we can’t have it all. However, Freud was one of the first people in psychology to acknowledge that women had sexual desire, and that repressing it in the way that many women were forced to do could lead to hysteria.
While the idea of the aforementioned wandering uterus is non-ironically hysterical, the point was still established: women cared about sex. They were not the passive, receptive, birthing vessels that they had been made out to be for so long.
Women during the time of both Freud and Whitman (and even now, in our modern era) were and are often expected to be pure. Pure as in no sex – which, as you will find after reading “The Body Electric,” is not an unexplored subject in Whitman’s writing. Throughout his poetry, Whitman works to represent (as he has so often stepped into the role of representative for other diverse experiences) women and the validity of their sexual desires. He makes sex something for all to see, as in “the privacy of night” within “Children of Adam,” writes of sex outside of marriage, and displays what was seen as private something public and proud.
Even through the shallow groundwork that Freud put forth and the deeper one that Whitman laid, there are still prevalent issues in our society today with invalidating women’s sexuality and sexual lives. Just one example is that women who have many sexual partners are seen as “slutty,” but men in that same situation are seen as “players.”
My question to you is: do you think that Whitman’s message worked? Do you think he did enough to represent women as a man, or did he cross a line by so boldly portraying the thoughts and feelings of women without being one himself (as Freud also did)? Are there inaccuracies in Whitman’s portrait of women, or was he a true representative?
This is my February 18th work.
Hi Emma! I think that these are excellent questions you pose regarding Whitman’s representation of women and sex. Like what was said in Justine S. Murison’s article, “Whitman, Women, and Privacy”, it is apparent in Whitman’s poetry that although he does eliminate secrecy and privacy of women’s sex lives, although I think his representations of both white and black women can be questioned as being accurate. During Whitman’s time, white women were seen as asexual but also ready for heterosexual marriage when the time came. Whereas black women were denied consent as well as “imagined as always consenting” and were considered the sexual other to white women (36). Although Walt Whitman tries to represent white women as sexual beings, they always end up as mothers, which I believe to be Whitman’s representation of women and not necessarily women’s own representation. Whitman’s pairing of sexuality and motherhood was very questionable to me, although he might view maternity as a sexual trope (36), it still made me question if he was truly trying to represent women or if he was using his own perspective on women’s sexuality to write about them. Murison points out this representation of motherhood in “I Sing the Body Electric”. Whitman’s views on the sexuality of black women sadly still aligned with the time period’s belief that their bodies were seen as public and exposed. That representation alone couldn’t truly represent the feelings of enslaved black women because he didn’t take into consideration consent. I don’t think Whitman was a true representative of women. Although we talk in class about how Whitman isn’t necessarily trying to speak for others but rather creating a space in which these voices can be heard, I don’t think his representation of women is accurate, especially in accordance with black women. These are just my thoughts and I would love to hear what other people have to say!
This is my February 18 work
Pingback:see page
Pingback:buy browning guns
Pingback:สล็อตวอเลท ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ
Pingback:sbo
Pingback:ccv dump
Pingback:sbo
Pingback:홀덤
Pingback:youtube news
Pingback:เงินด่วน 10 นาที โอนเข้าบัญชีถูกกฎหมาย
Pingback:Juul-Pods zu verkaufen
Pingback:wasabiwallet
Pingback:maxbet
Pingback:weed delivery mississauga
Pingback:buy remingtonarms buy ssauerfirearms buy bergara arms guns buy chippa guns buy magnum research guns benelli firearms guns buy night hawk custom guns buy howafirearms guns buy stoeger guns
Pingback:สล็อตวอเลท
Pingback:บริการเช่ารถหาดใหญ่
Pingback:briansclub CVV2
Pingback:sbo-betth
Pingback:snuscore
Pingback:ทินเนอร์คุณภาพสูง
Pingback:Native Smokes
Pingback:ป้ายบิลบอร์ด
Pingback:https://betwinner-turkiye.net/betwinner-giris/
Pingback:ufabtb
Pingback:สล็อต
Pingback:superkaya88
Pingback:ข่าวกีฬา
Pingback:ks quik 2000
Pingback:go x honolulu
Pingback:UFAPIG เดิมพันกีฬา และ คาสิโนออนไลน์
Pingback:dee88
Pingback:w69
Pingback:fortnite hacks
Pingback:ผ้า
Pingback:รับจำนำรถใกล้ฉัน
Pingback:เปรียบเทียบ เว็บพนัน Lsm99 กับแบรนด์อื่น
Pingback:swan168
Pingback:dark168
Pingback:ppf
Pingback:ทางเข้า lucabet
Pingback:5 carat diamond price
Pingback:ประวัติเว็บแทงบอลยูฟ่า ufabet